Sce data center energy efficiency program

There are a number of buildings in Portfolio Manager that received a benchmark during the reporting period, but for any number of reasons do not have current energy use data. Other Measures of Program Results to Date:. Budget for most recent year and next budget cycle if available :. Funding Sources name and description :. California Public Goods Charges. Technical support:. Best Person to Contact for Information about the Program:. Southern California Edison.

Phone number. Email address. Led by the CEC, the AB Working Group consisted of representatives from utilities, state and government agencies, and building and real estate professionals, including:.

Together, this diverse group addressed key issues surrounding AB , such as how best to preserve the confidentiality of customer energy usage data, the types of buildings to be benchmarked, and how AB should be implemented, which ultimately included a phased approach.

This system, referred to as ABS, was launched in February ABS processes requests once per day, and also provides an automatic monthly upload whenever a new bill is issued for an account. Utilizing this new system, requests for energy usage data will be processed multiple times per day, thus streamlining the overall process for building owners. SCE hopes that ABS will not only help building owners comply with AB , but will also empower them to better understand the energy usage of their buildings, and take action where needed to reduce energy usage, greenhouse gas emissions, and electricity bills, and increase the overall value of their businesses and buildings.

Energy benchmarking is a service provided to SCE customers, as such, the primary metric for measuring program success is the number of buildings benchmarked, as summarized above.

SCE says it is reviewing how to respond to the proposed penalties and intends to file its comments soon. Look at this savings?

Jordan Smith is a freelance journalist and translator covering issues related to energy, the environment, and politics. His work has appeared on the independent news site Opposing Views and at the Canadian Labour Institute. Get customized results? Let's go No thanks. Annual Energy Savings Achieved. Peak Demand Summer Savings Achieved:. Other Measures of Program Results to Date:.

Numerous community events, including energy walks, small business direct install, lamp exchanges, multi-family housing energy efficiency retrofits, and other events where local government partners co-brand SCE standard programs and deliver them to their communities. Budget for most recent year and next budget cycle if available :. Funding Sources name and description :. Best Person to Contact for Information about the Program:. Nancy Jenkins, P. Manager, Energy Efficiency Partnership Program.

Southern California Edison. Phone number. Email address. Jenkins sce. As a result, the reported activity is derived as the difference between the adjusted cumulative performance and SCE's Energy Efficiency Annual Report. Before , SCE initiated a limited number of informal arrangements, which helped develop stronger relationships with cities to address energy efficiency opportunities. In the program cycle, third-party programs solicited by the CPUC worked with a select number of local government entities.

Under this early model, third parties proposed specific activities, energy savings goals, deliverables, and program budgets, while the IOU performed direct administration and oversight. However, these third-party programs did not fully capture the spirit and intent of a partnership, were not coordinated, and varied significantly in incentive levels, approach, and expectations, resulting in program inconsistencies.

The third-party model evolved into a rudimentary partnership model, which retained much of the existing program design. This change enabled the IOUs to better coordinate partnerships, and to build consistency and efficiencies in incentives, processes, communications, and implementation. While many of the prior third-party partnerships were continued, new partnerships were also developed and added to the portfolio. In the program cycle, SCE continued to improve overall effectiveness by refining partnership implementation processes, and improving program internal controls and communications.

The partnerships improved in consistency and cost-effectiveness. Customers in these jurisdictions are also served by the partnerships. In , there were several significant changes to program design and implementation. Based on lessons learned, ELP was redesigned to capture key elements that were the most effective and compelling for the local government sector. The new model was designed to recognize local governments for taking progressively-comprehensive actions in demonstrating IDSM leadership.

The actions rewarded and recognized include retrofits that achieve tangible energy and demand savings, and longer-term energy action planning to ensure a sustained focus on IDSM actions. Within this model, as local governments achieve milestones in energy savings through municipal retrofits, they are rewarded with higher incentives to drive to deeper, more comprehensive retrofits.

The new model includes DR initiatives, as well as a requirement to develop and adopt longer-term energy action plans to ensure a sustained focus on energy efficiency within local government policies. Annual savings shown in the table below have not tracked annual spending, dropping in over